1. The primary issue is whether the Respondent has breached the order dated 12.9.02 as amended on appeal by publishing evidence given in the county court proceedings and information likely to lead to the identification of the child as the subject of the proceedings and thus whether he is in contempt of court. It is not known whether the Respondent admits all or any of the breaches alleged.
2. If the Respondent is found to be in breach of those orders, the court would need to decide whether and if so how the Respondent should be punished for contempt.
An application having been made for committal of Kingsley Albert Van Miller to prison for disobeying the order (breach of the undertaking) dated 12 September 2002 as amended on appeal The relevant terms of the order (undertakings) are attached.
- ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL -
It is ordered that Kingsley Albert Van Miller
The order is suspended until 8 June 2006
Kingsley Albert Van Miller
(a) The Respondent do not in any manner publish or distribute material given or produced in evidence in the proceedings S098POOQ26 whether referred to during the hearing of the case or in any judgment, in any publication letter, e-mail, website, booklet or leaflet or any other oral or written communication-
(b) The Respondent do within 7 days of service of this Order remove -from his booklets and all websites currently operated by him all evidence contained in judgments in proceedings S098CP00026.
(c) The Respondent do within 24 hours of service of the Order write to David Mortimer and serve a copy on the Applicant and the Court requesting him to remove from the website www. ukfathers. co. nk the following subsidiary website http://vww.ukfathers.co.uk/kip%20mill er%20-%20 Even%20Toddlers%20Need%20Fathers.htm and the following pages;
http://wvwukfathers.co.uk/Burge 1.2.html. BurgeZ. 1 .html,Burge 2.3.HTML, Burge 3.2,html,Burge 3.4.html,Burge3.6 html,Burge 3.8. html.www.uk fathers.co.uk/Application.html. If David Mortimer does not do so within 48 hours, the Respondent do forthwith e-mail www.eastersuch ,co .uk requesting to do the same.
And it is further ordered that in the event of non compliance any application for issue of the warrant shall be made to a judge.
PROVISION FOR COSTS
The Respondent shall pay the Applicants costs of the proceedings assessed at £300.00 by monthly payments of £50.00 to the Applicant direct, the first payment by 8 July 2005 and monthly thereafter.